/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12056360
>the only thing you can empirically observe is hippy bullshit
this is what sci-cucks unironically believe

>>11901785
>>11901787
>>11901788
>name paper "a proof of a theorem by euler"
>use cauchy's theorem to prove gauss' construction
>deduce, using grothendieck's formula, that riemann's theorem is true
>conclude

>>11566207
>thought the game was about factoring stuff
>it's about factories

>>10718348
+5 XOM shares has been added to your stock portfolio

>>10659360
t. doesnt understand what evolutipn is or how it works

At least learn the basics before you post, please.

>>10641223
>Having non-scientist entertainers speak on behalf of the scientific community
>on behalf of the scientific community

>>10544952

>>10520585

>>10513246
why do conspiracy theorists always talk like middle aged women?
>stabbing neonatals with needles and injecting them with fluids that are not regulated at all

Why is quantum mechanics so similar to Vedanta? Why is the big bang theory so similar to the bible?
Honestly I can't take the BBT seriously, it just reeks christianity to me. Talking about such fundamental things of our universe while admitting we know nothing about most of the matter... how big are chances this theory does not take into account something important?

>>9222188
smart but lazy meme

Why do I get so intensely bored and hate the boredom too much to stand it? Am I an ADD ridden brainlet or someone with a good bullshit detector and an easy grasp of the bigger picture? Do you believe that boredom has a large intellectual component?

I get so fucking bored of Dickens books when I see that he repeats himself and drags shit on and fucking on and employs the same "wry narrator" trick repeatedly.

My job involves lots of utterly pointless and bs economic forecasts that make me want to fall asleep. This is my BS detector going off the charts , right?

>>8851810
>that fake shoulder lean
Fuck off gold digger

>listen to podcasts with two famous people from social science / humanities
>they're discussing a contemporary issue
>filled with appeals to analogy, appeals to history, selective information, lies, and laughably huge generalisations

I don't get it. How can social sciences be so openly fraudulent? How can the media be so complicit? Seemingly every area of either bullshit or common sense has some social scientist attempting to monopolise it through pseudoscientific (or literary!) methods.

It seems like people pretend that domain knowledge can give them universal knowledge when that domain is wishy washy.