/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16175163
If they had higher intelligence why didn't they realize there was nothing in Australia for them and collectively leave a century or two later?

What would convince the abos to stay, abandoned their sea life, abandoned most of their intelligence and throw boomerangs at large jumping rats for millennial?

>>16041019
>small subset
>7 times
>11 times
>thick
>voluptuous
>few extra pounds
>large
>slimmer

None of this means anything without numbers. What is the numerical size of said small subset? What does 7 or 11 times mean compared to the average dating rate? What's the weight difference between a white woman """thinking""" she's large or slim when at least 40% of White Women are clinically obese?

>>16030478
>Definitely the high IQ populations, the low IQ populations will destroy theirselves without high IQs to save them

This makes no sense, by your logic 99.999% of the animal kingdom would have been gone and left earth empty. Yet somehow they're still around. But somehow you think low IQ humans which are a step above that capable of making spears and fire isn't going to survive on their own.

Are we even experiencing the same reality?

>>15967727
>pol/ seem to think that there will be a competence crisis because the society has gone "woke

There was already a competence crisis before the "woke" came into play.

Or are we going to pretend that shipping the majority of your manufacturing industry to your future foreign adversaries (who were never philosophically alligned with you) aka China or India was considered competent?

Or are we going to pretend that allowing your food industry to be dominated with ultra processed foods, high fructose syrups/ onions products so your population becomes increasingly obeses, diabetic and unhealthy was considered competent?

Or are we going to pretend that promoting feminism and single motherhood so women can become antidepressants addicted worker drones was considered competent?

Or are we going to pretend that allowing the judicial system to destroying families and wealth via divorce and family court system driving up male suicides was considered competent?

Or are we going to pretend that putting your country into Trillions of dollars worth of debt just to bomb some arabs was considered competent?

Or are we going to pretend that locking up every major milestone of adulthood such as education, ownership of car for transportation, ownership of a house behind a debt wall was considered competent?

Or are we going to pretend that creating a system which is effectively a pyramid scheme (social security) causing people to put money in a pot (taxes). One that they have a good chance of not getting it because of plummeting life expectancy rates (while also increasing the retirement age) along with the lack of money management causing insolvency within the next decade was considered competent?

Or will all this be ignored because it shows the complete lack of competency in a system before "woke" came to be and effectively puts the onus on mostly whites of older generations who pushed for this shit? Because it seems to me that even without wokeism the west was fucked.

>>15962559
>centuries of rape that occurred on black women doesn't count

>>15952747
>based jews
You mean the same ones who knowingly allowed a black immigrant woman married to a white guy to plagiarize the work of conservative native born black academics and get the president role?

Are those your "based" people?