/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8656785
>mr 3 years man
what does this even mean?

>>8629708
idc about your leanings, i only said the left is the one pushing the bogeyman, not that youre a leftist

>Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit is it?

>>8387307
good idea

i sort of wish i did the same

>mfw i've probably graded some of your assignments

you lean more towards applied or pure?

>>8371004
>>8370430
http://graphics.latimes.com/usc-presidential-poll-dashboard/
don't believe in the LA times?

>>8369518

>>8253182
you might want to read some math proofs of theorems that go beyond first year calc if you think you can just 'go through all possible solutions' with a computer, maybe go read about the proof of fermat's last theorem or the abc conjecture or the fundamental lemma

and the computer can only do what you tell it to do anyway

>>8242330
"a bit" is an understatement no?

So, as a non-retard, I am aware that psychology and psychology are pretty shitty disciplines. As a "scientist", I would never consider these two even approaching the natural sciences. I am borderline contemptuous of persons studying psychology/psychologists.

Having said this, I am pretty fucking depressed part of me is thinking that if I want to not fuck up my life I should probably see a shrink. However, I don't respect shrinks, and I more or less know what they're going to tell me. I don't need some moron telling me something I already know.

At the same time, I just can't continue like this. How do I resolve this logical conflict of interests?

I'm not actually looking for advice. This is /sci/, and I'm not completely retarded. I just want to see how a thread regarding this topic on this sort will develop. For science.

>>7615792
tfw working together and both getting better marks.

>proof communism works tbh