/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12119560

Not him but,

>redline blacks into debilitated urban neighborhoods
>debilitated urban neighborhoods have older infrastructure
>said older infrastructure still has lead incorporated in them despite being banned from production by the government
>lead can enter blood/cross blood brain barrier
>lead cause deterioration of executive functions in the brain which causes lower impulse control/ antisocial behavior
>crime rates in these debilitated urban neighborhoods are abnormally high
>most of the blacks in said debilitated urban neighborhoods even when they want to move out don't have the economic resources to do so they're stuck there
>rather than rebuild the infrastructure to reduce lead levels to absolute minimum the local/state/federal government just put a bandaid on the problem and dispatch more police
>because the police are low IQ lemmings payed to apprehend criminals and not solve the root causes of crime itself they don't realize (or don't care to realize) that they're constantly encountering lead poisoned people.

It's been a researched and established fact that lead exposure causes increase criminality. It's also an established fact that US blacks have been found to on average have the highest blood lead levels of all demographics in the country. And yet the answer is throw more police at the issue. Not to completely rebuild those neighborhoods, not to replace the water pipelines that contaminated with lead, not to medically treat the pregnant women/ children who are most vulnerable. No just throw more police at the problem.

That sounds like systematic racism to me anon.

>>11996252

Lipstick on a pig is still a pig. White Americans still have a bigger body count anon no matter how much you try to pretty it up. Again are you sure these MAOA Genes aren't defective? Because if the most dangerous thing African Americans can achieve are shitty street gangs then this entire debate is a nonstarter.

Read your own paper op.

>The signals of introgression in the West African populations that we have analyzed raise questions regarding the identity of the archaic hominin and its interactions with the modern human populations in Africa.

>Analysis of the CSFS in the Luhya from Webuye, Kenya (LWK) also reveals signals of archaic introgression, although our interpretation is complicated by recent admixture in the LWK that involves populations related to western Africans and eastern African hunter-gatherers (section S8) (20). Non-African populations (Han Chinese in Beijing and Utah residents with northern and western European ancestry) also show analogous patterns in the CSFS, suggesting that a component of archaic ancestry was shared before the split of African and non-African populations.

>>11913482

To be fair humans in general don't mature brain wise until 22-24 yrs of age. Ofcourse no country on this planet is crazy enough to make that the legal age.

>Can someone explain these results to me in a non /pol/ context.

Not all demographics have the same distribution in terms of college major pursuits.

>HOW THE FUCK do white students with ‘some college’ score better than blacks with graduate studies?

If there were on average more White students who dropped out/haven't finished a STEM degree yet it would make sense they would do better than Black graduates who on average do not pursue STEM degrees.

This seems pretty non controversial honestly.

>>11848737

>muh leftists media

What are you fools going to do a decade from now when all this bullshit is over? Will you still be sperging out on this about the media? Not that I honestly care.