/sci/ - Science & Math

>You have 12 hours to come up with a reason that psychology is not the best of all sciences
Protip: You can't

Define all your terms and then i will answer your question

Love

Adrenalin rush due to the activation of the sympathetic autonomous nervous system, which is correlated with feelings of affection.(when someone likes you their pupils get larger from the same effect or the increased heart rate, when anger is not involved).

Pic related.

With infographics.

Just watched Orgasm, Inc.and it was pretty terrible. I get that it's wrong to force women to take something that isn't completely safe, but why it it inherently bad to promote drugs that help increase sexuality in women? A lot of people are using the film as an argument against manipulating our emotions with drugs. In the AV Club review, the reviewer said:
>The mysteries of life can’t be solved by a little blue.
pill.
That's kind of arrogant, don't you think? The mysteries of the universe might not be, but the movie claims female sexuality is some impenetrable, irreplaceable mystery that science will never solve, blah blah. We don't completely understand love or sex right now, so all attempts to make drugs are completely useless? We have so many drugs that help fix problems like OCD, autism, ADD and host of other psychological disorders. Why is it suddenly bad to want to improve the emotions we already feel like love, happiness and trust. We could use drugs to engineer greater feelings for everyone but of course, the female reproductive system is some magical system that science will never conquer. There are technical difficulties right now, but that doesn't mean we should just give up and accept our "natural" emotions, we should work to make them better. Not cures, but enhancements.

Sorry about the rant, it just seems like all criticisms of Big Pharma come down to "Oh noez, so many drugs! Anti-nature, OMGCHEMICALS!"

>>1212289
Oh, wait.