/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10353032
Oh, also it's not asking for a source that should be bannable. It's when people give details of sufficient granularity to look into it, and then someone cluttering up the thread bitching about how that other post didn't run around the internet reconstructing exactly how they know what they know, finding sources that say roughly what they think they should, or citing books that you're going to come back and practically ask for an exact page number of. Demanding all that legwork.

That's the problem. You aren't entitled to shit. Someone tells you "it's kind of like this, it's over on one of those shelves" you have no justification to whine and complain until they go over and find it for you.

>>10331582
>remain hidden.
To you.

>Yeah its just a coincidence that every time a community of morons like you stops vaccinating for a disease said disease flares up again in that area.
Either exposure to viral shedding etc from vaccinated kids, or deliberate deployment.

>Mitigation is bad because eradication exists?
I just told you how you mitigate a disease.

>Your sanitation theory precludes any of this even if it wasnt.
That doesn't even make sense. I just told you, there is no evidence of a wild polio.

>People like you make me question having an unlimited political franchise.
Likewise. Democracy and its derivatives are by no means effective systems. They're a mask for power structures to hide behind.

Not part of the discussion.

>Explain the remarkably consistent outbreaks of disease in communities that stop vaccinating.
Explained above. People whoa re vaccinated shed and are rendered active carriers. The other possibility is that they're deliberately infected to uphold the narrative.