/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4328955
give this man a medal troll religion thread averted

>>4168020
this is /sci/ god dammit

it's because school isn't about learning things

it's about giving kids as much useless busy work as they can fit in their backpack to keep them occupied so they aren't committing crimes, huffing glue, having nonstop sex, and flooding the American workforce with cheap labor.

I need /sci/s help

say I have an equation of a plane: z+4x+2y=12
how do I find the max values of y and x in the first octant?

>>2661052
>>2661052

ya its possible, i've thought about this too, what i think the 4D is that, say you looked at your self in third person, like in a videogame, that space that you're looking down on yourself in would be the 4th dimension if that even existed, but since it doesn't you'd just be looking at yourself from a view point in the 3D just like 3 feet behind and above your self. but if the 4th dimension did exist it would be that place where your eyes existed, but you'd only be able to experience that very little portion of the 4th dimension, because your eyes would exist in there but you couldn't look around or feel or anything because all your senses would be in the 3rd dimension, and time can be a 4th dimension persay but its not really 'the' 4th dimension its just a dimension we added to our 3rd dimension,to create a 4th dimension. idk but i can tell you've been watching carl sagan

Radium-226 has a half-life of 1620 years. Find the time period during which a given amount of this material is reduced by one-quarter.

>>1943085
never change, /sci/

by the way, does your euler tat read e^i*pi=-1, or e^i*pi+1=0?

I hope you realize that nobody takes this board seriously

have you ever contemplated suicide?

>>1840637
I swear to god...

You're imagining in your mind, I assume, a hole in the fabric of reality. Like a literal hole. And I imagine you think it would work like opening the door to an airplane in flight, where lots of stuff would get sucked out.

The answer is either yes or no. Which one is right? Well we won't know until we have to deal with a hole in the fabric of reality. And I can assure you, if it's yes and the universe is destroyed, we wouldn't ever find out.

>>1479947

for the beauty of...

science.

Theists assert that a supreme being exists.
This is a positive statement.
As such, the burden of proof is on the theist.
He must prove that a supreme being exists.

Atheists have a 'lack of belief' in supreme beings.
This isn't a belief; it's a lack of belief.
As such, Atheists need not prove that religion is wrong.
The burden of proof is on the one making the positive claims-- the theist.

Discuss.

>>968625
I said "learning", not "learned"