/sci/ - Science & Math

why is philosophy incredibly important for science but not vice-versa?

>>11705382
and math is philosophy.
/his/ wins again.

>>9177216
this

>>9146897
:^)

>>8960329
Not every label(symbol) is an abstraction you idiot(Rude). Labels are generalizations and generalisations can either be mostly right or mostly wrong.
Generalizations describe abstract objects. Hierarchy is a concept.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concept
>ideas are proven by observation
mindlets actually believe this.
No, ideas are tested by observation. The Metaphysical truth of an idea is proven by reason. For example I can gather empirical evidence for the existence of Shrek the ogre by observing that onions do in fact have layers. However concluding that this proves the actuality of Shrek is arational. This is the weakness of empiricism. I do not disparage empirical evidence, I champion it. Just not as a means to truth.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalism

>>8957828
>>8957828
This is the complete image n00bs

What's a good math-oriented book on physics?

The classical textbooks (Sears, Halliday) seem very vague compared to a math textbook. I'm looking for a physics textbook written in a comprehensive way like Rudin's Principles.

>>7571725
>Yes, it's coming from the ball's rotation. The Magnus effect works because the ball's spin moves the air with it; obviously moving the air requires a force, which in turn creates a force slowing down the spin of the ball.
so if the ball rotates with respect to another axis, it go to another direction, such as up or left ?