/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15913653
At this point I don't even think you understand the difference between Hard and Easy problem of consciousness, and it shows in your unhinged rants.
>My ability to verify the internal states of other agents, real or imaginary, is in no way relevant
It is of the absolute relavence; science is all about verification.
The Easy Problem can and is verified through input/output; you don't just assume an agent possess functional intelligent without it passing for example a turing test.
The Hard Problem would need a method of verification as well. And since the object in question of the Hard Problem is awareness of subjective experiences, there would need to be a method that lets the tester observe what/if the agent is experiencing.
>And awareness is a well defined property, that you actually can program into a system, today
Again, you are talking about "awareness" in the Easy Problem functional intelligence sense.
>but I can't handle meh magic!!
Whatever magic means in your currently unhinged midwit mind is not my problem.