/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8033564
>All so-called logical fallacies are purely contextual.
No. Are you kidding me?
There for FORMAL and INFORMAL fallacies.
FORMAL fallacies are always wrong in all circumstances.

Fallacies are not determined by personal feelings or belief that something fits at all.
That's called the argument from ignorance, and is a FORMAL fallacy.
No amount of context can make a FORMAL fallacy rational or logical.

I don't even understand how you can get it twisted since Epistemology follows very ultra specific logical laws.

And no, you don't have a right to violate those laws.

Your use of FORMAL fallacies and trying to parlay them off as INFORMAL fallacies is ridiculous.
It's like you haven't actually studied the subject but looked them up online in the past year and decided to reject Epistemology because it got in the way of your egotism.

So keep it up. Use more FORMAL fallacies and look like a fool.
You didn't even know there were classifications of fallacies.