/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15198269
This. We saw the exact same thing during COVID era w.r.t. masking. Definitively shown to be dubious at best in a clinical setting and harmful at worst outside of healthcare for over 30 years of studies, all tossed to the wind during COVID. Stuff like this:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2020836#article_related_articles
I.e., strong-arming people into the “correct” interpretation of the data, has ruined the layman’s faith in science, and rightfully so. The people in the medical community that allowed that to happen have given nay-sayers to any field of science a leg to stand on. Not to mention the whole James Watson and racial intelligence fiasco. You can’t censor scientists like this, or the layman will no longer believe anything the so-called scientific community has to say. It’s that simple. If you care about climate change and really believe it’s an issue, then you should direct your outrage at those giving the scientific process a bad reputation.
>bonus: go after people like SBF (pic related) with equal fervor