/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12602370
Time to learn how to make a neural network fren.

>>12153984
Milf.
>>12154089
How much would a ticket for an E2E Starship ride probably cost?

>>12144273
AEROZINE-50
APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE SERVICE MODULE

>>12133749
Which futa hentai is this?
>>12133812
You mean Upotte!!?
>tfw no Saturn V milf gf
but also
>tfw no SS-520-4 pocket rocket loli gf

>Braun served as chief technologist in 2010, back when the Obama administration created NASA's Space Technology program to foster just this kind of innovation in America's private space industry. It was a contentious time in space policy, as the White House was pushing for more funding for new space companies—and new space ideas such as fuel-storage depots—while Congress wanted to keep NASA in the rocket-building business.

>Eventually, Congress got the upper hand, putting NASA on track to build the large SLS rocket at a development cost of more than $2 billion a year. The rocket program mostly benefited the Alabama space center and was championed by Alabama State Senator Richard Shelby. The potential of in-space fuel storage and transfer threatened the SLS rocket because it would allow NASA to do some exploration missions with smaller and cheaper rockets. As one source explained at the time, "Senator Shelby called NASA and said if he hears one more word about propellant depots he’s going to cancel the Space Technology program."

>The line from other NASA officials was that as a technology, propellant depots were not ready for prime time. In 2011, former NASA Administrator Mike Griffin and current Executive Secretary of the National Space Council Scott Pace—both SLS advocates—wrote a withering criticism of the technology for Space News.

>"Fuel depots as an element of a near-term space architecture are an example of magical thinking at its best, a wasteful distraction supported by the kinds of poorly vetted assumptions that can cause a concept to appear deceptively attractive," Griffin and Pace wrote. Ironically, their chosen heavy-lift rocket for use in NASA's "near-term" architecture, the SLS rocket, remains badly behind schedule and over budget. It is unlikely to fly meaningful exploration missions for at least three or four more years and is holding up the Trump administration's Artemis plan.

1/2

>>12054439

>>12016849
Achieving this starts with getting off of shitposting "redpills" on an anime porn warehouse's science section, and actually starting to learn science and math. Prove your superiority cracker.

>>12010260
>Nuclear thermal rocket has same initials as netorare

I can't get over this.

Reminder netorare and nuclear thermal rocket share an acronym.

>>11985522
> you will never rape von Braun's daughter like the Soviets in Berlin