/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9884948
and btw the "more complex and nuanced" includes stuff like there being more types of intelligence than the ones tested and the fact that some people just suck at tests or waking up for class etc etc..

the BOTTOM LINE is that human intelligence is SUBJECTIVE.. the best measure of it is another human being and their subjective "vibe" or inclination.. a fucking primitive test only nicks the surface but might be enough to help with employment when resources are low or something non-ideal like that.

Basing your ego on IQ tests though??

NOW THAT IS FUCKING RETARDED LOL.. indicator of a sub 150 brainlet.

Also people with high IQ being successful might be other factors like the people that took more than one test were in gifted programs in school or whatever, so they were more conditioned to taking the tests?? Every thought about something as simple as that you pathetic brainlet???