/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8652823
>>8652819
No one disputes that you dumb fucks. It's been warmer in the past, it's been colder, that's meaningless in the context of the current climate trend.

>>8652827
>debunked
Hate to tell you that you're wrong, and it's been confirmed by multiple independent studies since your so called "debunking."
http://www.rap.ucar.edu/projects/rc4a/millennium/refs/Wahl_ClimChange2007.pdf
http://www.pnas.org/content/105/36/13252.abstract
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235885717_A_Reconstruction_of_Regional_and_Global_Temperature_for_the_Past_11300_Yearshttp://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2013/03/response-by-marcott-et-al
http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v6/n5/full/ngeo1797.html

From Marcott et al. 2013
>Surface temperature reconstructions of the past 1500 years suggest that recent warming is unprecedented in that time. Here we provide a broader perspective by reconstructing regional and global temperature anomalies for the past 11,300 years from 73 globally distributed records. Early Holocene (10,000 to 5000 years ago) warmth is followed by ~0.7°C cooling through the middle to late Holocene (<5000 years ago), culminating in the coolest temperatures of the Holocene during the Little Ice Age, about 200 years ago. This cooling is largely associated with ~2°C change in the North Atlantic. Current global temperatures of the past decade have not yet exceeded peak interglacial values but are warmer than during ~75% of the Holocene temperature history. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change model projections for 2100 exceed the full distribution of Holocene temperature under all plausible greenhouse gas emission scenarios.

Don't believe whatever horse-shit you read on "skeptic" blogs.