/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10118427

https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15872

The link in question, and a data set from the paper depicting methane escaping through gas migration pathways in increasing quantities.

>>10117348

>you have no scientific evidence
>post scientific evidence
>you have no scientific evidence

You have to go back.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871174X16300488

https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15872

>>9909365

Here comes Shakova et al with the news: Bad... good... All of that is subjective. The information tells it's own story and then the human mind interprets it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kx1Jxk6kjbQ

Ok? Here she summarizes her opinions after years of working in the field.

And HERE is her evidence to support her claims.

https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15872

For YOUR convenience, I will highlight the models demonstrating methane destabilization.

" In 2008, the top boundary of this acoustic anomaly was located ∼5m below the seafloor; (b) in 2011, the position of the top boundary of this acoustic anomaly was reaching the seafloor, causing doming of the surface layer of sediments. During the survey in 2011, bubble plumes of CH4 releasing to the water column from the seafloor were observed at this site; multiple pockmarks in the seafloor were also documented within the site as shown in Fig. 6b."

What's this? What do you call this? That looks like an increase to me.