/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11140303
>Merely 3 trillion dollars
It strange how we can always find money for wars and tax cuts, but never for the environment.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iraq-war-anniversary/iraq-war-costs-u-s-more-than-2-trillion-study-idUSBRE92D0PG20130314
>Going beyond 30-40% is just cost ineffective.
???
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-power-renewables/renewables-overtake-coal-as-germanys-main-energy-source-idUSKCN1OX0U2?feedType=RSS&feedName=environmentNews
Theorycraft and FUD has to give way where it has been disproven bu experiment.

>>11113556
>Literally spelling out what their data shouldn't be used for AND that sun worshippers use it for in these threads.
I'm not really sure what you're even complaining about anymore. That the analysis isn't exhaustive enough for your tastes?
https://www.powerengineeringint.com/2019/11/02/renewables-cover-42-of-power-german-consumption/

>>10100475
It's hard to make predictions. especially about the future.

>>9784238
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=34292
Nukies are pretty pissed today. Of course I would be pretty pissed too if I had dedicated my life to a false god and now even my allies in fossil fuels and the utilities are abandoning me.

>>8196215
>Yes. Currently, however, I'm more interesting these:
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorcon
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM_(reactor)

Nuclear power is dead, man.

http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21578690-thanks-cheap-natural-gas-americas-nuclear-renaissance-hold-fracked

>>8196227
>Wind and solar have failed, because energy storage has failed. The expert discourse to the public on this from the so-called environmental groups like the Sierra Club, Greenpeace, etc., are full of lies, misinformation, or outright delusion - it's hard to tell which.

Time makes fools of us all.

>>7903009
>The doom will roll in the years ahead, but it will certainly not be a climate problem, it will be in the form of an energy poverty apocalypse. Canada can take it for now being an exporter, for now.

If you listen closely, you can actually hear the sound of Brian Wang grinding his teeth.

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/02/20/national/global-wind-power-capacity-tops-nuclear-energy-for-first-time/#.VteKEUbF_xP

>>7646121

>>7603738
>I like how this is an ironic jab at capitalism but capitalism actually let's bad businesses die and it's actually socialism that props bad businesses up artificially.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21578690-thanks-cheap-natural-gas-americas-nuclear-renaissance-hold-fracked

>>7435052
>They have effectively killed off nuclear power.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21578690-thanks-cheap-natural-gas-americas-nuclear-renaissance-hold-fracked

>Falsely believe that incredibly inefficient photovolatic power is sufficient.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>7290497

>>7183778
>Easily manipulated impressionable creatures that listen more to their emotions than cold hard facts and calculations. And they're very emotional about propagating it.

How about that fracking.