/sci/ - Science & Math

I don t know much about general relativity, but I hear that from our POV the matter which falls into a black hole would crowd at it s Schwartzschild radius but will never fall in.
Wouldn t that mean that black holes are impossible to form due to time dilation and would be stars which get denser very slowly?
This would also mean that light can escape a so called black hole but be very red shifted

I don't feel so good...

>>15072406
>>15072406
You're right I should have been more clear.
When I say black hole, I mean the extremely small, dark and massive objects that cause things like pic rel and quasars.
I am of course not positive that an EH forms in reality, and am pretty sure no one takes the idea of a physical singularity seriously.
So whatever the thing is that they are describing as a black hole.

>>12527286
How do you explain the extreme orbits of stars around an incredibly massive but invisible object at the center of the galaxy as in pic rel?
I think we can generally agree its probably not an infinite density object that occupies no space. Speak your heart anon.... Are they universes, including ours and since the time and space coordinates switch at the event horizon, us moving towards the 'singularity' accounts for the experience we know as time?
Do you get smeared across the event horizon with the information of you fired out of the poles?
Are they a swartzchild diameter bundle of strings that preserves information by adding you to the string?
Is there an all consuming firewall directly behind the EH?
Come on bro its fun. Put on your imagination shoes