[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.10968094 [View]
File: 234 KB, 634x875, 1490959932959.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10968094

>>10968066
OH NO ITS A MEGACORPORATION USING NEW AND SCARY TECHNOLOGY EVERYONE HIDE

>> No.10957469 [View]
File: 234 KB, 634x875, 1490959932959.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10957469

>>10957157
I agree

>> No.10603526 [View]
File: 234 KB, 634x875, monkey eyes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10603526

did the wealthy and the elite decide to from supporting eugenics to not supporting eugenics because they realized they are better off maintaining a monopoly on the genes that allows them rule over a large mass of 95 iq dull proletarians?

eugenics is genetic communism and will perhaps even make actual communism possible once everyone is on the same level.

>> No.10569987 [View]
File: 234 KB, 634x875, 1490959932959.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10569987

Who here wants to experiment with non-human wombs to host the birth of human embryos ?

>> No.10555813 [View]
File: 234 KB, 634x875, 1490959932959.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10555813

>>10545465
YOUR TIME HAS ENDED, BROTHER !

>> No.10542811 [View]
File: 234 KB, 634x875, 1553936858837.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10542811

man fuckin black holes n shit

>> No.10367272 [View]
File: 234 KB, 634x875, monkey eyes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10367272

would an interstellar empire that uses ships travelling at subluminal speeds be tenable if the average human lifespan was 5000 or 10000 years?

>> No.10301888 [View]
File: 234 KB, 634x875, monkey_eyes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10301888

>>10301777
Truthquads right fucking Here

>> No.10289434 [View]
File: 234 KB, 634x875, monkey eyes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10289434

i literally have schizophrenia

why do i exist. why didn't natural selection filter out my ancestors. i don't see any evolutionary benefit to this at all i'm basically half a potato. yet here i am, alive in the year 2019.

>> No.10287014 [View]
File: 234 KB, 634x875, 1490959932959.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10287014

>>10286793
Gorillas will evolve

>> No.10165415 [View]
File: 234 KB, 634x875, 1490959932959.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10165415

>>10164975
1+1=0

>> No.10053508 [View]
File: 234 KB, 634x875, 1490959932959.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10053508

>>10053505
I AM GROWING STRONGER !!!

>> No.9708496 [View]
File: 234 KB, 634x875, 1490959932959.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9708496

>>9708258
this is now Gorilla thread

>> No.9658225 [View]
File: 234 KB, 634x875, 1490959932959.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9658225

>>9658197
Yes, they occur by the uncertainty principal within access points of quantum vacuum space that be natural or man made

>> No.9015517 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 234 KB, 634x875, 1499244900583.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9015517

How does otherwise inanimate matter create consciousness? If the fundamental building blocks of our minds are inanimate, how can we experience things? Wouldn't it be the equivalent of putting so many oranges together that it eventually becomes a giant apple? Does that mean everything in the Universe is in fact sentient, only in different ways? It makes no sense for consciousness to exist only within the mind of the so called living beings, we shouldn't be conscious, the so called sentience should not be so complex, we should be more like bots, bots that can perceive is surrounding environment and draw some conclusions from it, but in an inanimate way, and yet here we are, why?

>> No.8976592 [View]
File: 234 KB, 634x875, you tried (i guess).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8976592

>>8976590
>still coping with faulty proofs: the post

>> No.8871126 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 234 KB, 634x875, 1491389048880.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8871126

When babby is in womb where does the poop go?

>> No.8807495 [View]
File: 234 KB, 634x875, 1491389048880.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8807495

How is dyslexia supposed to work if supposedly dyslexic people are capable of reading and writing proper sentences?

Seems like a meme affliction like depression to me.

>> No.8805494 [View]
File: 234 KB, 634x875, 1481469783278.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8805494

>>8805493
>Are they really saying nigga that much?
yes

>> No.8787202 [View]
File: 234 KB, 634x875, 1481469783278.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8787202

>>8786752
>Don't forget HMS is proved for them.
and the Hodge conjecture!

>> No.8780633 [View]
File: 234 KB, 634x875, 1481469783278.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8780633

>>8780611
>Apparently nor can you with endless ad hom.
please point out an ad hom i made brainlet, i'd love to see you try and make such an argument

you've just trapped yourself into your own fallacy fallacy

>In other words, it would make your entire argument invalid.
how so? there are different groups who can profit, i've already agreed with that earlier, i don't see why you keep repeating this nonsense. all i'm saying is if you choose one form of profit over the other, you don't get to complain about it later on

>>8780614
the definition of profitable has already been posted in this thread, there's no need to repost it, and i'm sure you already know the definition of research

try again

>> No.8772835 [View]
File: 234 KB, 634x875, 1481469783278.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8772835

>nuclear physics taught by a Russian
based

>> No.8762257 [View]
File: 234 KB, 634x875, 1481469783278.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8762257

>>8762250
i'm a grad student

>> No.8752437 [View]
File: 234 KB, 634x875, 1481469783278.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8752437

>>8752421
I don't know why you went on such a rant again, all I was pointing out was that you're essentially doing the same thing you're criticizing just in the opposite direction. You have such a personal backlash against the abstract, birds-eye-view motivation that you just throw everything towards the applied instead
> Besides, there isn't a single "pure" math problem that can't be traced to a "real world" motivation

That's all I was pointing out

Also
>No one actually does math for math's sake unless they're independently wealthy (fermat, pascal) or part of the priestly class (the pythagoreans) and can afford to do it for fun.
is patently false, whether you look at all the amateurs who tried (and still try) to solve famous problems like Fermat's Last Theorem in their spare time, or even Yitang Zhang who before becoming a lecturer spent his spare time reading arithmetic geometry journals when he wasn't working at Subway, or any of the other many examples...

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]