/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9561361
>That I don't care if you continue to suck at math, because you're waiting on a meme chart and other people to research for you. In the meantime I'm going to continue studying along the patrician path
cringe af to read, if you don't care about people being bad at math don't bash on their meme charts and provide a list of books you'd recommend instead.
>'extremely dumb' phrasing and hyperbole.
cringe as hell again, don't read into things too much and take them too literal, you make yourself appear retarded
>You said it wasn't as "in depth", if you meant it wasn't descriptive enough you should've said so - depth implies a quantity, given the context I assumed books. Further, DYOR.
sigh
>Are you unable to rearrange things mentally? This will be your first exercise.
bait attempt of a mentally challenged /pol/ user, I'll give you an imaginary applause for your efforts