/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15985852
No you aren't. You are presenting the rough math and then dismissing everything else with "thrusters and radars". You also conveniently forgot to address the comparison being infeasible. Sure, you might be able to dock a space station, when carefully planning the liftoff from earth decades later with millions times the magnitude in computational power and taking off from a highly developed planet rather than a barren empty space rock - not even accounting in both a previous liftoff, landing and another round of liftoff