/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11387623
I read some of this dude's metaphysics work once. Having read a lot of philosophy, it was utterly redundant with shit people have said hundreds of years ago. It was naive schizo bullshit dressed up in all these made up compound words that offer an illusion of novelty. As is often the case, people who are very good at a certain thing - such as math - are prone to think they have an advanced understanding on everything.

Also, if you rush to appeal to brain processes being adequately explained as a response to the hard problem of consciousness then you haven't even made it as far as understanding what the problem was.

See Leibniz's windmill analogy