/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5610316

>That assumption wouldn't change anything because your assumed non-interacting soul spirit has no effects.

It would have the effect of empowering your asserted beauty.

>That's just an objective biological fact.

Yes, but without an understanding of superstitious thinking you would be unable to manipulate the promise that such people would ever be able to experience life as you do, in this life or another.

>implying I will post pictures of myself on /sci/, so that needy neckbears can jerk off to them

Then I must dismiss without evidence your claims that you are attractive.

Fact is, understanding consciousness is an essential element in seduction, a skill that you should have as a 9/10 woman. That you deny consciousness can mean only one of two things; a) you're the stupidest and most sheltered woman in the world, and nothing you say about consciousness or science can be taken as authority OR b) You are hideous and you deny consciousness as a means of blocking the pain of being maligned by fortune.

Your move.

>>4758212
It's doable.. an old professor in my college did it, but I can't remeber how

>>4313191
> Undergrad and probably already contributed more to my field AND yours.

>>4280575

Is it safe to say that C++ is only uniquely necessary for game development? That is, that game development is where C++ stands out from other languages.

Please tell me if there is anything more. I don't intend to make games, so please tell me what I'll be missing out on by not learning it.

>FYI I already know and use Java, Javascript, PHP, and Python
>non-career programmer

Physicists are just butthurt because they waste their time getting a pish posh degree and end up at an engineering job which they automatically blow at.

>>4113056

>If an idea is unfalsifiable (i.e., cannot be proven false through experiment or other such testing), then that idea is assumed to be erroneous.

False. This is a common but nonetheless flawed line of logic.

Unfalsifiability does not preclude truth. The only direct statement that can be made is simply that present testing methods cannot make a statement about an idea's truth value.

Once sufficient testing methods are developed, then we can perform the experiment and conclusively form a theory. Suppose that testing shows the original idea to be true. Here is the critical fact: The idea was not any less true before the experiment than after the experiment. The role of the experiment was to define the truth value for human intellect, not for nature.