[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.7734342 [View]
File: 243 KB, 588x533, predictions wrong.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7734342

>>7732125
Your sir, are a denier.

>> No.6755978 [View]
File: 243 KB, 588x533, predictions wrong.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6755978

>>6755963

You have no demonstrated that these were caused by Anthropogenic CO2.

As if flooding doesn't happen. As if land levels never change. You have provided no evidence that distinguishes this from normal land-level/sea-level variance.

I mean who said that that if Miami Dade county didn't have flooding, they'd stop believing in Climate Change? No ONE!

This quasi-religious belief system is pathetic. its like when my fundamentalist mother would talk about barely getting missed by a car on her way home. "God was looking out for her." So what? If she'd been hit, would that prove that god doesn't exist.

What about the countless cities in Florida that didn't flood? What about the massively frozen Antarctic. What about the non-melted Arctic? The flat global temperatures for 15 years? The lack of the "hot spot" in the troposphere? The failed models? The statements about snow becoming a rare thing?

Oh yeah, heads you win, tails I lose. The essence of a pseudo-science.

Nothing can shake your faith.

>> No.6622760 [View]
File: 243 KB, 588x533, failed model.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6622760

>>6622234
>>6622572

It does become confusing when you have contrary charts like this, which seem to indicate that the predictions are off.

>> No.6593026 [View]
File: 243 KB, 588x533, predictions wrong.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6593026

>>6592411

>Climate model prediction works => Climate Change is True!
>Climate model prediction fails => Model needs to be tweaked but Climate Change is True!

Them there's some great science there. The models failed miserably yet we're supposed to believe that scientists understand things enough for us to believe "The Sky Is Falling! Give Government Your Carbon Tax Money!"

Whatever.

Yes
>>6592420
I know, facts like the failed models don't belong in /sci/, they belong in
>>>/pol/
because muh feels.

Warning: This graph was made by a former NASA scientist and co-inventor of satellite temperature measurement techniques. However, he's an Evil Denier, so by definition, everything he says is false.

Doesn't change the fact that the "science" is filled with failed models. Yet we're supposed to believe that CO2 will be the death of us all unless we submit to the United Nations

>> No.6532770 [View]
File: 243 KB, 588x533, predictions wrong.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6532770

>>6532742

B.S. Roy Spencer is a Professor at UAH, former NASA scientist and co-inventor of the satellite method of measuring temperature. One of the best climate scientists in the world

>> No.6400467 [View]
File: 243 KB, 588x533, predictions wrong.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6400467

>>6398922

All the predictions failed.

But, muh, the climate is always changing!

>> No.6385557 [View]
File: 243 KB, 588x533, 1393645575455.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6385557

>>6385364

Nonsense...

BTW, Once upon a time, the "consensus" said that the Sun revolved around the Earth.

>> No.6345674 [View]
File: 243 KB, 588x533, 1392000882547.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6345674

>>6345661

There has been no global warming in 17 years. Yet they want to tax carbon....

Never mind that temperatures have flatlined as CO2 went way up. And all the climate models failed.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]