/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8340822
Fellow chemfag here (carbohydrates and organometallics)
Why does pointing a laser at graphene oxide reduce it? Do you release molecular oxygen? What wavelength do you use? What's stopping the oxygen from just reacting with the graphene again?

>>8208836
Depends what you're doing anon. Go read about cable theory

>>8202828
Yeah that's been known for a while now, it's a shit show.

Literally every month a group will publish a paper about how they discovered a new way that neurons encode information or demonstrate a new kind of plasticity

>>8184637
>>8184581

>not recognising influential papers published in your field
>valuing the Wikipedia aesthetic over being able to immediately recognise a frequently referenced work

Freshmen pls delete this

>>7569618
>basfeijen.nl

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

http://www.basfeijen.nl/evolution/

>>6379210

>New information is what we are looking for here. NEW.

http://zeus.zeit.de/wissen/umwelt/2009-12/spektrum.pdf

>>6379241

>I would also ask you why should this "dilemma" be dismissed?

http://www.sns.ias.edu/~tlusty/courses/landmark/Kimura1968.pdf

>>6379266

>Selected is not created.

http://www.genetics.org/content/101/3-4/335.full.pdf

>>6379276

He's recycling stuff from William Dembski.

I'm sorry, OP, but we don't have free will.
We are a prisoner to our own biological influences and the conditioning that we have had during our developmental stages.

I suggest you read the Mahabarata some time as it boils down the whole "Free Will" versus "Fate" debate pretty well.