/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15248649
>I think it's the accusation of "grooming" children that triggered a huge moralfaggot response.
It doesn't help that many of us were literally groomed by faggots as children and saw the poison ourselves.

Even if there is no sexual grooming, there is ideological grooming there.
Like how we groom ourselves on 4chan, only with far far less self criticism and awareness.

They'll raise the idea of id only with regards to sexuality.
But you'll be damned if you dare raise the idea of the id again after submission to it initially (because self doubt is not encouraged in many of these groups nowadays).
Gone are the leather gay scenes where it was nothing but self loathing upon self loathing. There are people literally believing that the manifestation of their subconscious self loathing is actually something else completely now.

That is what I call a "cult".

>>14796793
>http://berkeleyearth.org/papers-climate-science/
>many of them are from Nature

Almost had me there. Nature is a garbage journalistic source. It's clearly there for one purpose and that is whatever the administrative elite wants to lobby.
Maybe I need to compile all my Nature related screencaps, because I found that resource hilariously biased.