/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8896830
>Not sure I understand. Are you saying you actually want to see a biased study?
I'm saying not even on biased studies Africans manage to be on par with Westerners. Feel free to try and prove me wrong.

When you account for environmental factors (nutrition, flynn effect, education, wealth, etc.) blacks still fall behind.

>>8852082
>[citation needed]
It's in the fucking pic I posted before.

Here you go:
https://www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf
"30 Years of Studies on Race Differences in Cognitive Ability" J.P. Rushton and Arthur Jensen (2005)

>All we know is that ON AVERAGE certain races outperform others intelligence-wise because the genes positively correlated with intelligence are more common among the individuals of such races.
Yes so common so as to constitute a difference of more than two standard deviations between Europeans and Native Africans and more than one standard deviation between European Americans and African Americans.

>Agressiveness in certain races can easily be changed trough education.
Education can only take you so far.
IQ differences among races persist even when correcting for education, culture, upbringing, and social class. Clearly there is a genetic component to it that remains unchangeable.

I won't bother to reply to your irrational appeal to emotion at the end of your post. Fact is, Western IQs are declining due to the importation and higher rates of reproduction of genetically inferior stock.