/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6341000
>7+6=10+4

>>6294501
>and you will get a job
>get a job
>not creating a job for yourself
>not creating jobs for others
>not having employees
it's like you want to stay poor forever and not use that degree for all it's worth

>>5533346
>tripfag

>>5521684
>some crap

>>5410031
English in the future please.

>God's wisdom
>personifying God

I'm not motivated by science or mathematics.

I like them. I was above average at them, understood what I was being taught in lessons and, if I'm honest, was better at it than most people in my classes (I was in top sets and all that). However, because I found it numb-skullingly boring, I could never sum up the willpower to revise or study. Of course, this lead to me dropping behind and ultimately failing my first year of A-levels. I didn't revise for my GCSE's either, but I sailed through them with A's.

I'm just curious - do you do maths and science because you actually enjoy doing it? Or do you do it for the money? I can't understand how are people are motivated by it in this day and age, when the biggest scientific discovery in a long time has been the Higgs Boson - and that's hardly something that's making me people leap out of their seats.

Eh, I'd just like to know. I'm doing a Sports Btech next year, because I love sports. It gets my adrenalin pumping, heart racing, makes me into a whole other person. I don't think I'll ever get that from academics.

Also, for those of you who are interested: If you had a tube of marbles a light-year long, and pushed the marbles at one end along by one (somehow), would it take a year for the marble at the other end to fall out?

What the fuck am I reading?
How high were you when you typed this up?

>>4898559

"I am self smarted"

>>4854216

>find a particle that can repel gravity. create a worm hole, throw gravity-repeling particles inside before supergravity crushes the worm hole, enter it and exit in another place.

>>4781230
>believes he knows more than some of the world's leading neurologists and computer scientists together

>rank these by order

>>4647065
So it isn't what it sounds like. My apologies for assuming but was the assumption that far from close?

>>4647071
>implying implications

>>4647091
pic related.

>>4612149

>>4586522

>>4579077

>>4569641
I didn't think they had 4chan in psychiatric asylums.

>>4474151