/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10504019
Okay.

I don't know what you are familiar with, so I'll just give a simple example. Advanced concepts, such as any well known mathematical theories and equations, have the same mechanism as a simple concept.

When you think of a grape, what do you feel? Some visual representation of it, or maybe a little taste in the mouth. These are not much, because the word grape alone is not a strong stimulus.

When you initially tried to learn the concept of grape, a simple visual stimulation is probably all you have. However, as you learn, and as the grape is always connected to the taste of sweetness, when you again think of the word grape, it fires an action potential. It partially activate the taste, aside from the visual representation.

Then, when I ask you what a grape tastes like, you are not going to think that this is nonsense. Because the information has been connected.

>>10504022
I'm talking about omitting a certain degree of formality. People have to relate with their own personal experiences.

>>10504041
This is not anatomical. This is a theory of information which did not exist before I invented it. People did not have the slightest idea about co-activation with different information types, and data analysis was basically just about finding patterns and useful features. There didn't exist a single concept of what I said. I don't know how to word it otherwise but I'm being honest.

>>10504080
Well, I'm just attempting to explain intelligence.