/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10360988
You clearly don't understand what I mean by origin, it cabe wherever the fuck you want, as long as you don't change it's location once you define it.
Well I'm talking about reality, not math.

>The fact that it can be empty
It's full though

>makes it space in the first place
It's not empty, it's a pressure mediation. Its like differentiating whether steam is different than ice, both are the same thing in a different form. Space is just matter in a different form.
>so that shit can travel it and occupy it.
"it", so you're once again reifying an absence of something

>Of course this "emptyness" is relative, because if we go in other fields, space is actually never empty.

An interesting way to hide a contradiction.

>>10360998
>Not knowing the fundamental forces

Gravity is not a force. Neither is magnetic attraction. It's an acceleration. *Towards what* and *by what* has yet to be explained, so the question is "what causes the force"...basically another repeat of the question I've asked over and over.

>when pressure needs space
Pressurizing something changes the quality of it you moron. Water, steam and ice are all different qualities and pressures of "water". The amount, "quantity" or "mass" of the fucking water doesn't change whatsoever dipshit. If you have a full tank of fucking air and you pressurize it (with more air itself as against itself) and then release that pressure, all that occurred is a pressure mediation. No "gravity" or "force" ever occurred. You simply returned the fucking air to the pressure mediation of "less compressed air", using ITSELF.
Saying that it "needs space" implies that at some point it can actually be "full" which if that were the case then everything would be inert and full. Well that's why "water flows downhill" just as energy and heat is moved from where it is to where it isn't. Why would a full tank of water