/sci/ - Science & Math

Say, hypothetically, I proved the Riemann hypothesis.

Where would I go to publish my research?
What would be the results of my proof?
What other outcomes would result?

THIS STUPID CRAP DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE!!!!!!!!

THIS STUPID FUCKING SHIT MAKES NO SENSE!!! WHY ARE MATH PEOPLE SO FUCKING STUPID?

>>10432855
I like this thing-a-ma-jig, even though I have no hope in hell of ever understanding its true significance, much less proving >muh rh

Despite hundreds of years of so-called advancements in modern science, you 'people' still are in pursuit of some special magical formula, a formula to make yourself a lot of money, live longer, cure all disease, and so forth, in a way no better than alchemists that believed that some special elixir of life existed.

You see, in life, there exists not just a 'material' truth, but also a 'moral' truth. This is essentially what it means for the world to not be flat. One plus one is two, because God says it has to be, for all that is right and just - you can't expect that one dollar plus one dollar will ever net you three. One plus one is two because one more than one is two. One plus one is two because when you add one to one you get two. See?

It may be ironic of me to say this on a science board, but I pray to God that a plague shall wipe out every wh*Te barbarian alive, like God brought upon the Egyptians for their sins and crimes against humanity. May nuclear missiles wipe out USA, Israel, UK, France, Germany, and every cowardly nation on this earth who denies that there even is such a thing as God.

If in this universe it were physically possible to create a 'super weapon', a weapon capable of destroying entire cities, entire continents, or even entire planets, as though by an act of God, how could it possible work?

My guess is that it may be possible to create some kind of dissonant gravitational-electro-magnetic field that can induce electrons to scatter from their nuclei, thus causing any type of matter to completely disintegrate.

>>9863785
>>9863792
Chinaman here. We chinks when we think of math are actually thinking of sex. Math is the outlet of our perverted sexual urges because our dicks are too small. We can't even solve something as simple as pic related. The educated and intelligent Westerner probably knows everything and is just laughing at us for being stupid.

As everyone knows, the Western world once believed the world to be flat.

Take the notion that "1 + 2 + 3 ... = -1/12" for instance, a relation used in calculations such as the Casimir force. It is based on the assumption that divergent sums of physical quantities can be equated to a finite value. Consider for a moment the following thought experiment.

The world is a three dimensional field. The total "length" of the "height" dimension could be said to equal 1 + 1 + 1 ...., being infinite. If one equates this to -1/2, then one is literally saying that the world is flat. So this notion of "zeta regularization" is just a fancy way of rationalizing that the world is flat.

Of course, this does not go to say that the aforementioned calculation does not agree with empirical evidence. However much like religion, even if what one is saying in some way agrees with what people see, that does not mean the story one is telling is literally true. The logic behind it is what is wrong.

So after so many thousands of years even after the dark ages, it appears that the Western world is still of the opinion that the world is flat but now uses sneaky logic to try to justify it. What gives?

Mathematics and real life meanings are inescapable. If people are talking about something then chances are it relates to something in real life.

Intellectual cowardice and pseudointellectualism run amok in academia. Professors think they are gods who can just do as they please and steal all the ideas they want from others. It takes not just intelligence but a sense of fortitude, and as such I suspect that some of even the so called best will not be able to solve this any more than they can admit they are not gods.

What if the truth of the Riemann hypothesis (and other problems like P can NP) correlates to some real life situation that people don't want to acknowledge as the truth, thus making them unable to so much as think it?

>>9044069
here it is in the simpleset possible terms:
this schloopy-hoop graph goes through the origin infinitely many times
and it never goes through the origin if you change the 1/2 to something else

If prime, 2017 is the year Riemmen's Hipothesis is proven right or wrong.

Math general.

Do all of the non-trivial roots of the Riemann zeta function have real part 1/2?