/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8281381
>That's not an argument at all.
It IS the argument. We will not be replacing 1 billion internal combustion engines with 1 billion electric vehicles, like evar! Like I said, EV fill a niche and are actually just more Jevons paradox.

>>8283837
Do you think car batteries are just going to materialize because muh warmings? Do you comprehend how much oil goes into the manufacture of a single 12 volt car batter let alone some huge battery array to run and EV?
You people got your heads in the sand. At most we will see maybe 5% EV and in cities only before things really start to fall apart this century. Too many people is the problem, not CO2. That's a problem no one addresses but is really the elephant in the kitchen.