/sci/ - Science & Math

real scientist like meat

>>15847762
a challenger appears

>>15614111
>IQ tests are bologna.
and astronomy is sausage

>plant-based milk
as nonsensical as sausage based astronomy

par for the course in astronomy, its all fakery hiding being
>you can't see it because you don't have a $20billion telescope, so you'll just have to trust us
and the vapid soigoys swallow the story errrry single time

>>15272987
>imagine if someone just said that pictures of sausage were from jwst

>>15209631
dead ringer
very little doubt that the TWC India editor who picked that image for the story was alluding to picrel hilarious sausage incident

>>15174865
The sausage episode was priceless. Publicly humiliating the IFLS crowd might've been worth the absurdly exorbitant price of JWST, Elon Musk paid $44 billion to essentially do the same thing . If Dr. Musk PhD thinks he got a bargain with Twitter then the $88 billion cost of JWST could be justified.

NASA flamboyantly wasted tens of billions of other people's money launching JWST and so far, with the official mission lifetime now 20% expired, the biggest thing JWST has discovered is that s o y goy soience fanbois are gullible and willing to believe anything, no matter how stupid or ridiculous, as long as you say it came from JWST.
Why is JWST such a failure?
Why are s o y goy soience fanbois so gullible and low IQ?

>>15148155
>JWST pics are real!!!
>NASA would never lie!!
>anyone who doesn't believe in JWST is a racist science denier!!
in 1986 NASA intentionally destroyed space shuttle challenger as a means of hiding a four year delay in the launch of HST which was caused by NASA engineer's incompetence and laziness.
the shuttle program was kept out of service and didn't come back on line until after the engineers had wasted half a billion dollars fixing the unnecessary problems caused by their laziness and incompetence. They told the general public the whole affair was over O-rings. So if NASA fucks up on an expensive project they make up a story and lie about it and say theres nothing wrong and that no mistakes were made. If JWST doesn't work right, NASA can always issue fake pictures and nobody will know the difference, the soigoy fanboi crowd has already indicated they can't differentiate between andouille and Antares and don't care to learn how to.

>>15148082
in 1995, nasa announced that they were going to build jwst, they said it was going to take 12 years and cost half a billion dollars and that it would be an 8m telescope.
they were off by over an order of magnitude on the cost and way off on the other factors too, so yes, nasa scientists and engineers are incompetent. the ones who work on jwst are particularly incompetent. the nicmos retard worked on jwst, thats how stupid and incompetent the jwst ppl at nasa are.
but the general public can't tell the difference between sausage pics and space pics so none of it makes any difference, if jwst pics are fake or real makes no difference

>>15118010

Was there any bigger science news events of 2022 that carried more weight and impacted more people than JWST's space sausage pics?

>>15076300
>We have two photographs
>We
sure you do, you thought that sausage was a jwst pic, but this time you're positive 100% that the pics are real (same as you were when you thought sausage was a jwst pic)

Why did so many people in the scientific community think that a picture of sausage was a JWST pic?
Was it because JWST sucks balls or because the scientific community is retarded?

astronomers
>you need to give us all your money for free because we need space telescopes because looking at space from earth is not good enough for us to do our incredibly important jobs

also astronomers:
>nooooooo! you can't use satellites because that interferes with our incredibly important jobs looking at space from earth

explain your logic astrofags, do you people think that you own the sky?
also how come the most significant astronomical discovery of the 20th century was made from earth by an amateur using a small telescope?
how come the most significant astronomical discovery of the 19th century was made from earth using a small telescope?
how come the most significant astronomical discovery of the 18th century was made from earth by amateurs using a home made telescope?
how come the most significant astronomical discovery of the 17th century was made from earth using data from home made telescopes?

lmao at the gullible drooling low iq idiots who unironically believe that jwst is producing any real science

>>14887222
i fucking love astronomy

>HAY GUISE, I'M TOTALLY AN EXPERT IN SPACE AND JWST
>I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE
>differentiating between a picture of sausage and a picture of space?
>no i cannot do that.

>>14869766
jwst is a massive financial swindle thinly disguised as a science project