/sci/ - Science & Math

10748171

>>10099667
Imagine being such a brainlet that you actively hate mathematical structures.

>>10072646
>can't predict outcome but you just said the graph would be a bar at 100% for one trial
exactly. there's no way of predicting WHERE on the axis that bar will be.
>Before I flip a coin which facet of its outcome is predicted to be 100%??? Please enlighten me because this is what you said earlier, or you just didn't understand because you're sperging.
just like before, you're so damn close to getting it.
>Each trial has thousands of outcome possibilities, not two.
nibba do you know what a coin flip is?

nice word salad though. unfortunately I have an actual background in statistics and am not impressed with your incoherent rant no matter how much jargon you throw in.

>didn't click the video so I didn't deny shit.
>I can't be accused of rejecting evidence if I refuse to even look at it!
>NO DON'T SHOW IT TO ME
>MY EYES ARE TOO PURE FOR THIS FORBIDDEN KNOWLEDGE
pathetic

>I'm still not sure because apparently it's possible to take a weather aggregate in your world from only two week repeated trials as if it were flipping coins but they didn't?
>If an aggregate is possible they : did,didn't make them? If an aggregate is possible and they didn't make them, why not?
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

10032920
at least make an attempt with your bait

>>10024946
>people were starving!
>but there was food everywhere, so we had to cut back on production
exactly, dumbfuck.
it wasn't a case of "not enough food to feed people". it was a case of "the economy's collapsed, so millions of people are out of work and can't afford to put food on the table". FDR and his advisors did what it took to get the economy rolling again.
this is all historically verifiable fact, by the way. your inability to make sense of it only shows how stupid you are.

>Hahahaha, pick one
"the domestic price of gold would stay the same" and "the supply of money increased" are not mutually exclusive, retard.
you're the one who thinks the value of a dollar would be cut in half by the import/export price of gold being increased 70%.

>The absolute state of communist economic understanding
>look ma, I'm projecting!
also, not remotely a communist. I'm a social democrat with a splash of Third Way and a strong technocratic streak.

>>9891461
>The object's pressure (density) is weaker than the pressure (density) of the medium it's in
I better add dimensional analysis to the long, long list of things that flatheads stubbornly refuse to understand

if you actually think pressure and density are the same or even interchangeable, there's no hope left for you and you should probably just commit kakuro