/sci/ - Science & Math

has anyone here seriously considered possible ways to become a kemono catgirl or foxgirl?

>>11773456
If you are worried about proofs, I suggest you give this a look. Not only does it have exercises that make you prove and deduce, but also makes you analyse the proofs to find their vulnerabilities, Try them and hit me with questions if you so wish (maybe babby's first proofs but still better than the Trump vs Obama from last thread). https://people.maths.bris.ac.uk/~sz16567/Writing%20mathematical%20proofs%20-%20exercises.pdf

>>11773467
>Provided that I have a passion for math and treat mathematics as if it is a job by allocating 40 hours per week (or more) studying it, it is really possible for me to go to gradutate school
I don't promise you any grand futures as a professor somewhere, but I am fairly sure you would be accepted.
>respected
No idea about this. Perhaps. I wouldn't place my bets on Oxbridge/Ivy League unless there were signs of big talent (and/or a bit of extra money), but I think [math]\text{decent} \le \text{your future grad school} \le \text{respectable}[/math] would be likely. I don't know how the English speakers' system works, to be desu.

>>11731158
I guess the easiest way would be to use conjunctions to get truth on precisely one row and then take a disjunction of those. There could be fancier ways to do it, but that would at least give you what you want. For example, if you wanted FTFT, then you'd take [math](p\land\neg q)\lor (\neg p\land \neg q)[/math]. The values would obviously be like:
p q
T T
T F
F T
F F