/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9057440
Since we're descending to ad hominems (the standard leftist tactic when they're out of evidence) I doubt you've even completed an undergraduate degree, skippy, let alone anything more advanced. You're so utterly deluded by socialist rhetoric that it's impossible to even have a discussion with you.

Human clades exist which map in very general terms onto "race" as a popular concept. They are the consequence of geographical separation and assortative breeding, as with any other animal. You'll have to go with sources more knowledgeable than Bill Nye on this one, I'm afraid. In fact it's such a useful concept that racial subdivisions are used in medicine and forensics to this day owing to their clarity in distinguishing human phenotypes. The one place where human diversity doesn't get its due is, oddly enough, what we call "black" since heterogeneity is so high there. From a practical standpoint it would be very reasonable to make more careful distinctions between sub-Saharan African populations - I expect we probably agree on that much, albeit for different reasons.