/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14779059
>True. I guess there's no way to know until we actually go there.
Or you could do experiments on how animals react under a variety of gravity levels. Perhaps using some sort of ISS Centrifuge Accommodation Module built with the express purpose of doing just that. Such a thing would provide some of the most valuable information you could obtain in a LEO laboratory and answer many questions about the effects living under less-than-Earth gravity has on the body. It's not like NASA would cancel such a valuable module after it was already mostly built right?

We have all of these money to build these expensive space telescopes that have a life span of only a few years due to onboard fuel constraints, yet NASA some how doesn't have the money to finish a space station module that could potentially lead to the elimination of most deformities caused by a micro gravity environment.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrifuge_Accommodations_Module

That was canceled in the year 2005, had it not we might have been able to see the Star Ship integrate such technology. I would rather delay an X-ray telescope for 30 years if it meant we could could start producing gravity for destinations such as Mars & beyond.

It's funny that NASA can afford these Space Telescope but they're not willing fund something like the following even though it would be game changing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrifuge_Accommodations_Module

>>12623063
It's funny that NASA can afford these Space Telescope but they're not willing fund something like the following even though it could be game changing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrifuge_Accommodations_Module