/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9737736
>>9737738
>mad /pol/acks
not an argument, friendo

>>8998007
>all evidence points to them being knuckle-walkers
literally a lie
Lucy's pelvis, like that of all australopithecines, was rounded, bowl-shaped, without the elongated ilia that are seen in gorillas and chimps. this is a definitive marker of bipedalism, which is why you're so eager to ignore it.
you've been caught in lie after lie, and you're still just doubling down on them hoping for truth-by-repetition. you quoting the Serpent is more fitting than you realize...

also
>2017 CE
>unironically believing that evolutionary biologists literally worship the organisms they study.
ISHYGDDT

>>8627463
>Measurement apparatus has 3% error.
such amazing apparatus that they had back in 1812.
oh no wait, they didn't. the Pettenkofer process didn't come into use until 1857 (this is stated in the ABSTRACT), which coincidentally is when measured carbon dioxide levels went back to what we've generally considered the baseline (~290ppm).
so either CO2 levels dropped drastically and nearly instantaneously just as a better and more accurate measurement process came into use...or the old measurements before then aren't actually reliable, like I said.

your own cited paper implicitly rejects your claim in the actual abstract, you dumb /pol/esmoker.

>>8532746
>That graph is from the IPCC
literally a lie. that graph started out as one coming from the IPCC...and then someone else blew it up so that the poor resolution made it hard to accurately read, and then drew an entirely different data series over it (again, in a very thick line to obscure differences) so we can't see it.

>hurr durr evil error bars
sounds like you're so hell-bent on pushing your own opinions, you're refusing to acknowledge the variability/error inherent in the measurements. data tampering much?
also, you don't know what "structural uncertainty" means. (protip: it's not error bars)

>>8498928
>rectum: prolapsed