/sci/ - Science & Math

>After finding the Lagrangian
You don't state your starting point.

Do you see a contradiction somewhere? It seems you just state how to get one quantity from the other. Your formulas look right, what's the problem?

Which A?

Why is P the name of a proposition and a set?

P(x,Q) is formally not a property, P is. (don't fill in the arugment).

>BUT THE PROOF, I just cant follow it.
Which proof, I think that's just the definition of the schema - or what do you try to do?

> > Quantum Groups - (Algebra)
> > Topological groups
> > Lie groups - (Lie Algebras)
> > Representation theory
> > Special functions - (Number theory)
> > Differential equations - (Lie Groups)
> > Partial Differential equations - (Functional analysis)
> > Ordinary Differential equations
> > Harmonic analysis
> > Fourier analysis
> > Potential theory
> >
> > Cartan geometry - (Fibre Bundle, Lie Groups)
> > Riemannian geometry - (Differential Geometry)
> > Kähler manifolds
> > Pseudo-Riemann geometry
> > Klein geometry
> > Euclidean geometry
> > Non-Euclidean geometry
> > Elliptic geometry
> > Hyperbolic geometry
> > Lie sphere geometry
> > Affine geometry
> > Convex geometry
> > Conformal geometry
> > Plane geometry
> > Trigonometry
> > Discrete Geometry - (Graph Theory)
> >
> > Fractal geometry
> >
> > Dynamical systems - (Mechanics, Differential equations)
> > Ergodic theory
> > Bifurcation theory
> > Optimal control theory
> > Optimization
> > Calculus of vations - (Differential Equations)
> >
> > Metric spaces - (Topology, Riemannian geometry)
> > Measure theory
> > Ergodic theory
> > Probability theory
> > Stochastics
> > Statistics
> > Estimation theory
> > Game theory
> > Decision theory

Might be over the top, but I have no clue and there are several threads on such issues on math overflow, google a combination of "f(f(x))" and "Mathoverflow". The links theirin should lead to paper references such as

http://reglos.de/lars/ffx.html

>>5949491
IF there are fixedpoints, then they are {-1,2}, but I don't think it helps too much.

>>5922239
>>5922242
I don't understand your solution.
For one, if you move from green to yellow, then you don't seem to stard in the upper left corner.
Also, are you sure you only hit every field once?

>>5922195
yeah,
so in math speak the questions is if the following graph has a Hamiltonian path

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamiltonian_path

starting at the vertex <span class="math">(1,1)[/spoiler], and also what the path is, if it exists:

The graph is given by the 100 vertices
<span class="math">\{(1,1),(1,2),(1,3),\dots,(1,10),(2,1),(2,2),\dots,(10,10)\}[/spoiler]
and two of these vertices <span class="math">(a,b)[/spoiler] and <span class="math">(c,d)[/spoiler] are connected if one of these 8 cases hold:
<span class="math">(a,b)=(c\pm 3,d)[/spoiler]
<span class="math">(a,b)=(c,d\pm 3)[/spoiler]
<span class="math">(a,b)=(c\pm 2,d\pm 2)[/spoiler]

>>5640067
I don't, however if you search for such notes, initial keywords inclusde:
ADM formalism, Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity, spin networks, Dirac contraints

I think one needed quite high education for this kind of patent job and there weren't so many academia positions anyway.
I too find it sad that so many other people are unknown to the public (I work with a guy from the air force and today when I notoriously talked about turing machines during lunch he told me he wouldn't know eighter Turing, von Neuman, Hilbert or Gödel...srlsy?).

>>4725623
no, the code is still code format.
Go to the #7 type, and then type "esc int esc", you'll see what I mean.

Is talent something you just have without asking?
So, is admiration of other people reasonable?
Is disciplin something you have?