/sci/ - Science & Math

It's absolutely hilarious how black hole believers call non-believers schizo when they themselves are fully schizo - since all alleged black hole models pertain to a universe that's spatially infinite, is eternal, contains only one mass, is not expanding, and is asymptotically flat or asymptotically not flat. But their big bang cosmology pertains to a universe that's spatially finite (one case) or spatially infinite (two different cases), is of finite age, contains radiation and many masses including multiple black holes (some of which are supposedly primordial), is expanding, and is not asymptotically anything.

Thus black holes and the big bang contradict one another - they're mutually exclusive. This is undeniable and clear as day. And despite numerous claims for black holes in their millions, none has ever been discovered.

And it's surprisingly easy to prove that neither General Relativity nor Newton's theory predict black holes to exist.

It's also not difficult to prove General Relativity violates the usual conservation of energy and momentum. There are fundamental contradictions contained in black hole theory, big bang cosmology, as well as in General Relativity. Their attempts at numerical methods to prove their theory are therefore meaningless.

Oh and for those who'd like to use the defense that in an expanding universe energy isn't conserved and thus the "energy conservation law" is false and therefore all criticism of Einstein's field equations are incorrect, friendly reminder to you that Einstein required his field equations to satisfy the usual conservation of energy and momentum.

To do so he introduced his pseudotensor which has been demonstrated to be entirely meaningless – see: https://z.zz.ht/98S5i.pdf and related: https://z.zz.ht/ZMeXe.pdf

The big bang theory is based upon Einstein’s field equations. Since the field equations violate the usual conservation laws, the theory of a big bang is fundamentally flawed.

>>11849819
All alleged Black Hole models pertain to a universe that's spatially infinite, is eternal, contains only one mass, is not expanding, and is asymptotically flat or asymptotically not flat.

But the alleged Big Bang cosmology pertains to a universe that's spatially finite (one case) or spatially infinite (two different cases), is of finite age, contains radiation and many masses including multiple black holes (some of which are supposedly primordial), is expanding, and is not asymptotically anything.

Thus black holes and the big bang contradict one another - they're mutually exclusive. This is undeniable and clear as day. It's surprisingly easy to prove that neither General Relativity nor Newton's theory predict black holes to exist.

Despite numerous claims for black holes in their millions, none has ever been discovered. It's also not difficult to prove General Relativity violates the usual conservation of energy and momentum. There are fundamental contradictions contained in black hole theory, big bang cosmology, as well as in General Relativity. Numerical methods are therefore meaningless.

Oh and for those who'd like to use the defense that in an expanding universe energy isn't conserved and thus the "energy conservation law" is false and therefore all criticism of Einstein's field equations are incorrect, friendly reminder to you that Einstein required his field equations to satisfy the usual conservation of energy and momentum.

To do so he introduced his pseudotensor which has been demonstrated to be entirely meaningless – see: https://z.zz.ht/98S5i.pdf and related: https://z.zz.ht/ZMeXe.pdf

Big Bang theory is based upon Einstein’s field equations. Since the field equations violate the usual conservation laws, the theory of a big bang is fundamentally flawed.

Because you should be.

>what is Einstein's Pseudotensor?
In an attempt to make his General Theory of Relativity comply with the usual conservation of energy and momentum for a closed system which a vast array of experiments has ascertained, Einstein constructed, ad hoc, his pseudotensor. That it is not a tensor is outside the very mathematical structure of his theory. Beyond that, it violates the rules of pure mathematics.

>Einstein’s Pseudotensor fully explained here:
https://z.zz.ht/98S5i.pdf

>what is The Landau-Lifshitz Pseudotensor
In an attempt to make Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity comply with the usual conservation of energy and momentum for a closed system which a vast array of experiments has ascertained, L. Landau and E. Lifshitz constructed, ad hoc, their pseudotensor, as a proposed improvement upon the pseudotensor of Mr. Einstein. Their pseudotensor is symmetric (Einstein’s is not) and, they say, it permits a conservation law including angular momentum. That it isn't a tensor is outside the very mathematical structure of Einstein’s theory. Beyond that, it violates the rules of pure mathematics.

>The Landau-Lifshitz Pseudotensor fully explained here:
https://z.zz.ht/ZMeXe.pdf

>>11791184
>the Jew Feynman
>or
>Landau and Lifshitz
Neither for me!

>what is Einstein's Pseudotensor?
In an attempt to make his General Theory of Relativity comply with the usual conservation of energy and momentum for a closed system which a vast array of experiments has ascertained, Einstein constructed, ad hoc, his pseudotensor. That it is not a tensor is outside the very mathematical structure of his theory. Beyond that, it violates the rules of pure mathematics.

>Einstein’s Pseudotensor fully explained here:
https://z.zz.ht/98S5i.pdf

>what is The Landau-Lifshitz Pseudotensor
In an attempt to make Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity comply with the usual conservation of energy and momentum for a closed system which a vast array of experiments has ascertained, L. Landau and E. Lifshitz constructed, ad hoc, their pseudotensor, as a proposed improvement upon the pseudotensor of Mr. Einstein. Their pseudotensor is symmetric (Einstein’s is not) and, they say, it permits a conservation law including angular momentum. That it isn't a tensor is outside the very mathematical structure of Einstein’s theory. Beyond that, it violates the rules of pure mathematics.

>The Landau-Lifshitz Pseudotensor fully explained here:
https://z.zz.ht/ZMeXe.pdf

>>11768662
>>11768722

>what is Einstein's Pseudotensor?
In an attempt to make his General Theory of Relativity comply with the usual conservation of energy and momentum for a closed system which a vast array of experiments has ascertained, Einstein constructed, ad hoc, his pseudotensor. That it is not a tensor is outside the very mathematical structure of his theory. Beyond that, it violates the rules of pure mathematics.

>Einstein’s Pseudotensor fully explained here:
https://z.zz.ht/98S5i.pdf

>what is The Landau-Lifshitz Pseudotensor
In an attempt to make Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity comply with the usual conservation of energy and momentum for a closed system which a vast array of experiments has ascertained, L. Landau and E. Lifshitz constructed, ad hoc, their pseudotensor, as a proposed improvement upon the pseudotensor of Mr. Einstein. Their pseudotensor is symmetric (Einstein’s is not) and, they say, it permits a conservation law including angular momentum. That it isn't a tensor is outside the very mathematical structure of Einstein’s theory. Beyond that, it violates the rules of pure mathematics.

>The Landau-Lifshitz Pseudotensor fully explained here:
https://z.zz.ht/ZMeXe.pdf

>>11727419
>Here is some science, bro.

>what is Einstein's Pseudotensor?
In an attempt to make his General Theory of Relativity comply with the usual conservation of energy and momentum for a closed system which a vast array of experiments has ascertained, Einstein constructed, ad hoc, his pseudotensor. That it is not a tensor is outside the very mathematical structure of his theory. Beyond that, it violates the rules of pure mathematics.

>Einstein’s Pseudotensor fully explained here:
https://z.zz.ht/98S5i.pdf

>what is The Landau-Lifshitz Pseudotensor
In an attempt to make Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity comply with the usual conservation of energy and momentum for a closed system which a vast array of experiments has ascertained, L. Landau and E. Lifshitz constructed, ad hoc, their pseudotensor, as a proposed improvement upon the pseudotensor of Mr. Einstein. Their pseudotensor is symmetric (Einstein’s is not) and, they say, it permits a conservation law including angular momentum. That it isn't a tensor is outside the very mathematical structure of Einstein’s theory. Beyond that, it violates the rules of pure mathematics.

>The Landau-Lifshitz Pseudotensor fully explained here:
https://z.zz.ht/ZMeXe.pdf

>>11697612
>what is Einstein's Pseudotensor?
In an attempt to make his General Theory of Relativity comply with the usual conservation of energy and momentum for a closed system which a vast array of experiments has ascertained, Einstein constructed, ad hoc, his pseudotensor. That it is not a tensor is outside the very mathematical structure of his theory. Beyond that, it violates the rules of pure mathematics.

>Einstein’s Pseudotensor fully explained here:
https://z.zz.ht/98S5i.pdf

>what is The Landau-Lifshitz Pseudotensor
In an attempt to make Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity comply with the usual conservation of energy and momentum for a closed system which a vast array of experiments has ascertained, L. Landau and E. Lifshitz constructed, ad hoc, their pseudotensor, as a proposed improvement upon the pseudotensor of Mr. Einstein. Their pseudotensor is symmetric (Einstein’s is not) and, they say, it permits a conservation law including angular momentum. That it isn't a tensor is outside the very mathematical structure of Einstein’s theory. Beyond that, it violates the rules of pure mathematics.

>The Landau-Lifshitz Pseudotensor fully explained here:
https://z.zz.ht/ZMeXe.pdf

>>11663071
>Einstein's pseudotensor

>>11578389