/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11677915
>destroys your argument

>>9845059
Let's take my example again, you add 1 gallon of Calcium and 2 gallons of Phosphate

You let the reaction complete. Then you measure the solution. You find 1 gallon of Phosphate remaining, and 0.001 gallons of Calcium.

What happens if you add more Calcium?
Dump in 1/2 a gallon of Calcium, then measure the solution again. This time you find 1/2 a gallon of Phosphate remaining, and 0.002 gallons of Calcium.

The amount of Calcium hanging around in solution barely increased. Because all of it is being consumed by the chemical reaction.

This tells us that adding more Carbon into the ecosystem will probably not change the amount of carbon hanging around in the atmosphere. For the most part, the Carbon will become new life forms.

In the air above a grassy field, the concentration of Carbon Dioxide is half that in the atmosphere. Why? Because the grass is hungrily sucking the CO2 out of the air as fast as it can.

In greenhouses, they will artificially increase the amount of CO2. They will bump up the CO2 levels to about 1200ppm, leave it overnight, and the plants have sucked it all out of the air, leaving CO2 levels back down at 400 ppm. You will also notice the plants growing way faster as they greedily suck up the extra CO2.

We know that in the dinosaur days, CO2 levels were far higher than today. And what do you know, the earth was a tropical paradise. The land was so productive, it could support massive creatures the size of a house. The jungles of the Jurassic make the Amazon rainforest look like your grandmother's flower garden

I'm not here to argue for creationism, but I am here to argue viciously against evolution--knowing in my heart and soul my duty to spread knowledge and information to the pridefully ignorant.

I mean just think about it: nothing happened and then here we are? Not very logical sounding is it? No, no, no, but is creative (somewhat) I guess I can say. I mean, if evolution was true, then the far reaching implications of that would be disastrous.

Here's something my granpops once told me: open a jar of spaghetti. Look inside it. Do you see new life? Are there new organisms crawling through the muck and into the air to breath? No, that never happens. And you're darn glad it doesn't, because if evolution were true, the entire food industry would collapse under the weight of contamination of new life.

There's just so many holes here... gosh. It can be mentally draining arguing with such a defunct and idiotic idea. I guess I just want life to be better, and people to be happier. So evolution, real or imaginary? Please do not be silly and choose to be an ignoramus.