/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12687073
>when you have a vehicle capable of sustaining human life in space for years on end (an interplanetary spaceship)
>sustaining human life in space for years on end
>interplanetary spaceship
>for years on end
fucking retard im surprised you figured out how to post

a trip to fucking mars will be several months in a tiny tin can wasting away to zero gee
how the fuck do you connect the ability to do that to the ability to construct multi kilometre long space habitats with full earth gravity and a population in the millions? why the hell are you putting a small vessel that can carry maybe a couple hundred people to mars on the same level as setting up the entire asteroid mining infastructure required to support your trillion dollar celebrity clubhouse?

I dont have a problem with space habitats but holy fuck man imagine thinking they're gonna compeletely replace planetary colonization, let alone thinking that it'd be easier.
people will have been living on mars for centuries before one of your giant space dildos gets built.