/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15509184
>prove a negative

>>15468700
Pretty rich considering that you claim "why" questions are"theology" and then proceeded to claim "why" never matters. It's like saying:
>The reason never matters.

Yes it does you book learned retard. It's the only thing that matters.

>>15156048
>but you seem to be ducking and diving intead of staying on topic
Your entire premise relies on the existence of a "vacuum". Show me proof of a "vacuum" in nature, otherwise your example is a complete waste of time because it wouldn't prove anything. Lets take a stroll down memory lane to the first post. I don't care if your op or not, it's completely on topic despite your low attention span.

>The 2nd law of thermodynamics states that high pressure will immediately seek equilibrium with low pressure.
Which means a vacuum CANNOT EXIST. It's impossible.

>The heliocentric model claims that “gravity” is the “container” that keeps the earth’s pressurized atmosphere from immediately seeking equilibrium with the vacuum of space.
There is no "vacuum of space"

>The “pressurized box of air in a vacuum”
WHAT "PRESSURE" "IN A VACUUM"? WHAT "ANYTHING" IN A VACUUM? IT SITS THERE NEGATING THE FUCKING "VACUUM" BY EXISTING YOU RETARD.

>Gravity never prevents the air from going into the vacuum.
A description indeed does not prevent air going into a non existent place. This sentence makes no sense when taken literally.

>Gravity only has one vector - DOWN
And where the fuck is "down" in a vacuum?

>UP into the vacuum.
>into the vacuum
>negating it being a fucking "Vacuum" in the first place.

Your example and misinformed/illinformed opinion about gravity and space is appreciated, but ultimately doesn't mean anything.

>>14481401
>You wouldnt even be having this discussion or know about any of this without me and my work psued
You're not Einstein
You're not Poincare
You're not Maxwell, Gauss Faraday, Heaviside, Steinmetz, Tesla or any other Electrical engineer of note.
You're not Walter Russell, Mark Twain or any other buddy of Electrical engineers of note
You're not Hutchison, Ed Leedskalnin, Eric Dollard or any other Electrical engineer of no note.

You're a namefag, on an anonymous imageboard. Literally a living contradiction. You have nothing but a paper that references more than one of the above people, just like the millions of other papers before you.

>>14481428
>and Im the schizo again eh?
Your words, not mine

>I am so far ahead of the curve you people here can barely eve comprehend the most basic topic for me to pontificate on
Be careful, the air is thin up there where you're above everyone.

>>10518452
properties are properties. Ice has the property of being cold but "cold" is not a thing in itself.

>>10519767
It's an action of a field.

>>10519078
Hope your being paid to repost this. Time is money.

>>10518675
>interpretations make things real
No