/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5887261
>implying I'm not American

>implying other countries don't have their own fashion, music, movies, and tv shows

>implying most of your technology and video games are not Asian

>implying English isn't an international language because of the English

WOW. You are really naive. I used to be like you, until I actually got a chance to travel the world a little bit. Get out there and check it out for yourself!

Living in this weird patriotic delusion you have isn't healthy. It also isn't productive. It is the prime reason America is failing behind. If you keep putting your fingers in your ears and refusing to acknowledge your problems, HOW THE FUCK DO YOU EVER EXPECT TO CHANGE THEM?

Countries must evolve and compete to stay relevant. Take the best parts of each other and adopt that shit. The world already adapted the best parts of America, and have now surpassed us, and what the fuck did we do? Refuse to change, and keep spouting we at #1?!! So sad.

>>5874100
>can't into chronology of the universe
>can't into standard model

I understand the point you are trying to make, I might draw a similar conclusion if I didn't know much particle physics.

The kind of "fluctuation" that started the universe isn't the same as the "fluctuation" that could exist today. You are totally confusing your symmetries son! Do you know about symmetries?

Originally all forces were one. The notion of modern matter/particles doesn't even exist
before the Grand unification epoch!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_the_universe#Very_early_universe

Krauss (all scientists) are talking about a fluctuation that seeded space-time, and the grand unified force. This is not the same thing as the shitty quantum fluctuation we see today.

The underlying concept is the same though. And there are a shit ton of simulations/tests that have confirmed that a fluctuation of this sort could in fact cause the big bang.

It is possible for some strange ass "nothing" to fluctuate in a certain ways, such that it produces space/time/matter/quantum vacuum.

The quantum vacuum is a result of this initial seeding, produced by a fluctuation of this "primordial nothing state". Get it?

>>4930401
>getting kicked out at 16 was my fault, not my bipolar now-on-probation crackwhore mother

Cry me a fucking river. No one gives a fuck about your shitty childhood. Lot of people have a shitty childhood, but they were FUCKING SMART ENOUGH TO OVERCOME THAT SHIT, go to fucking college, and follow there dreams. YOU FUCKING WEREN'T! Bottom fucking line! You need to get your fucking shit together son.

You need to go to college now, follow your fucking dreams, or kiss them goodbye. I want you to achieve dumbass! I am trying to help you here, so is everyone in this thread. You need to get a fucking clue, and go to college ASAP.

\thread

Apparently the neutrino didn't go faster than light..

///////////////////////////////////////////////
http://dvice.com/archives/2011/10/speedy-neutrino.php

>>3928334
>no scientist in their right mind would claim that antiparticles are particles going backwards in time

Feynman world like a word with you

The marjority of physicist at Cal-Tech would like a word with you

The majority of physicist at CERN would like a word with you

The majority of physicist at FNAL would like a word with you

The majority of physicist at BNAL would like a word with you

should I go on?

Sorry, i couldn't hear you over my Nobel prize and the moans coming from one of my hot female students and bongo drum music.

Do i need to come over there and slap your shit guys?

>>3093243

Fuck bitches every night while being a great scientist.

Is that even a question?

Sagan is a pot smoking faggot

>>2906526