/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3634327

Where's all the funnies?

>>2694684

This one is done much better. But picture is god-tier quantum hilarity.

>>So theres a computer that has knowledge of everything that ever was

>Heisenberg's uncertainty principle

Enjoy your unpredictable and yet still determined free will

The little jew in my picture.

Please sci i need your help in a bad way. How do I do this?

The vectors v1=(1,-2,3) and v2=(0,5,-3) are linearly independent. Enlarge {v1,v2} to a basis for R3

I bet this has something to do with magnets.

Rest assured, quantum physics does work. Our microprocessors are based on quantum tunelling.

It's not a bunch of wild speculation. Even string theory has solid mathematics behind it.

>>1807544

I agree with this. I tried to learn assembler. Anyone who can do bitwise operations, and make do without IF..THEN statements is pretty much made of win.

>>1803839
Thank you, would not have seen this without the bump.

In return, comic!

http://dresdencodak.com/

So all the universe's stuff was smooshed together at the beginning, yeah? That means, at one time the balls of every dude that ever existed were touching. So all men everywhere and everywhen are gay. QED.

There was a thread on /tg/ the other day discussing free will and some guy started yammering about there not being any since the universe is perfectly deterministic.

I'm not sure I buy that, but it got me thinking. Assuming it would be possible to trace all reactions back to the big bang and then all reactions forward in time from a given point if you had a sophisticated enough computer, would you be able to do it with a computer less complex than the universe itself?

I love this one simply because I read it in voices from old cheesey cartoons.

i lold

>>1003231