/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8251537
>The limits of measurements, because when you >make a measurement at a certain scale you begin to destroy information because of the act of measuring itself.

>The sense of self and free will is a very popular discussion in these sciences
>Nothing to do with genetics.

>It's not a science

Glorious. You inject mysticism into simple Terminology and form of repertoire and rhetoric.
You're simply too stupid to comprehend.

The NEED or the comfort to communicate is also not representative for any other form of need or the same need for other forms and certainly not for how you communicate with people.
>Formulate idea without language.
Even if so you would still be lost. You would be ,simply autistic, by empiric standard at least.

Don't tell me you're a better mathematician than this guy just because you're born a hundred years later.

-The book deals with the problems of philos-
ophy and shows, as I believe, that the method of formulating these problems rests on the mis- understanding of the logic of our language. Its whole meaning could be summed up somewhat as follows: What can be said at all can be said clearly; and whereof one cannot speak thereof one must be silent.

You'll discredit the whole "philosophy" you're part of.