/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7490741
>He finally pulls on the bottom right which elongates the bottom right string

Nigger what the fuck are you talking about, do you not know your lefts from your rights?

>>7471135

What, did you watch a youtube video on AI 101? Fuzzy logic has nothing to do with what we were talking about. When you said fuzzy, I assumed you were talking about unclear, or uncertain, as I told you intelligence is a relative concept that has no meaning on it's own and is therefore subjective. Fuzzy logic, which is a fucking logical theory, has nothing to do with what we were talking about. Fuzzy neural networks doesn't have ANYTHING to do with what we were talking about. I'm starting to think you just pulled that out of your ass since you had no clue what to make of anything

>>5773310
>intergalactic life

>>5763760
>Fancy myself

Why do people do this, what is the point of believing you are better than other people, the more you know, the more you realized you know nothing.

I graduated from school by 15, and i failed a year due to bullying, so i had to repeat that year.
I could have graduated by 14, i started college by 15, and by that time, i was already with knowledge in advance mathematics(complex calculus, basic analisys,topology,algebraic structures)

And that is just talking about math, and not chemistry and physics, and i have never considered myself to be intelligent, what is the point.


Just do what you like and be happy, dont care about other people care about yourself, you just need to compete with yourself.

And about the thread, the fact that you think something is simple now, but it wasnt before, is because you are already conecting the patterns, remember that, the more you practice, the more you start to see the patterns more easily, eventually you will be so good, that you can even solve those things in your head.

Keep practicing.

>>5746240
>Psychologists don't "treat" anyone. Apparently you're not qualified to have any opinion on the topic at all, if you can't even distinguish between psychologists and psychiatrists.

Psychiatrist also dont treat people, they just "diagnose" people and give them medicines created by psychopharmacologyst.

Please explain to me, what does a psychiatrist does, and a psychologyst does.

Please dont say that the psychiatrist does psychotherapy because i would fucking laugh my ass off.

>Just stating observations. That's how science works. And it wasn't an ad hominem because you didn't present any argument I could of dismissed.

Yeah, because you are not using circular logic, and saying things you cant prove.

I already showed you, that the APA, knows there is a lot of pseudoscience in the field, if you dont live in america, then show me, the empirical evidence based theories of your country.

And like i said, please exclude any type of psychology branch that works with neuroscience or pharmacology.
>psychoanalisys

Well it is being teached, in a lot of places, and used in a lot of places,is great then, that psychoanalisys is not being used where you live, we are moving forward in this discipline.

>Experimenting.

Does those experiments, show your predictions were right?, if not.
Then it doesnt matter the experiment, the only thing that matters is the evidence.

>>5743712
Real medicine
you are too tired? and without energy?
Some test are done.
You have anemia.

Fake medicine aka psychiatry using psychology.

One man comes and say he is sad and doesnt look the psychiatryst to the eyes.

You have depression.

Other man come and say the same, that he is sad and doesnt look the psychiatrys to the eyes.

You have autism.


Other man come and say the same, that he is sad and doesnt look the psychiatrys to the eyes.

You have social anxiety.

and on, and on.

Psychiatry is a good applied science, but basing most of his part in psychology, is wrong.

Psychiatry only works as a really applied science, when it comes to disease like, schizophrenia, autism,bipolar disorder,dementia u other disease that are proven physical.

Say we know all laws of the universe. Say we know all the exacly data about all energy released from the big bang a second after. Say we have supercomputers able to handle that data. With knowledge of how exacly that energy will act, in all eternity, we would know the future. What would happen if we would try to change anything?

>>5615838
Right... I guess you'll just continue being mad then.

>Note: the Earth is not this close to the sun, this image is for scale purposes only.

GLOBEL WARMING IS REEL IM TIRES OF PEEPLE DISCREDITING AL GORE! HE IS A GRATE MAN HE INVENTED THE INTERNET! THE SAME THING YOU ARE ON RIGHT NOW! YOU WOULDNT BE ABLE TO TROLL IF IT WASNT FOR HIS GRATENESS!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK367T7h6ZY

Uh, /sci/.....Why the FUCK aren't we using Thorium reactors?

I don't get it man, I just don't get it...thermochemistry just tears me to pieces.

Heat of combustion for 2-propanol in a bomb calorimeter at 298.15 K is -33.41 kJ/g. For 1 mole of 2-propanol what's a) deltaU b) deltaH

a) since v = constant, deltaU = q = -33.41 kJ/mol x 60g/1mol = -2004.6 kJ/mol

b) deltaH = deltaU - w, since v is constant deltaH = deltaU = -2004.6 kJ/mol...but the solution manual claims w =/= 0. Why is this?

Just how were the quantum numbers derived by Schrodinger's equation?

A movable piston in a cylinder holding 5.0 L N2 is used to lift a 1.23 kg object to a height of 4.5 meters. How much work (in J) was done by the gas?

The only equation I have to work with is w = -PDeltaV, no idea what to do.

Why don't corporations offer salad for people who already have salad? What?

What are the differences between the commutative law of addition and the associative law of addition? Khan Academy's videos appear to be describing the same thing. Thank you.

>>3768096
Do you not know the kinematic equations?... or... what?

>>3628637
>whatever increases the well being for conscious creatures.

You realize that EVERYONE - from Hitler to Gandhi - thought they were doing this? "Well being" is subjective, just like morality.

>>3554592
>>3554563

data is :
x:7,6,8,6.5,7
sum of x values:34.5
x mean:6.9
sd of x: 0.714

y:38,35,42,36,37
sum of y=188
y mean=37.6
sd of y=2.70185

sum of xy values:1305

Finding covariance of xy
1/4(1305-5*6.9*37.6)= Cov(x,y) = 1.95

Therefore
r= Cov(xy)/SxSy ;
r= 1.95/(.714x2.70)=1.01152