/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3164619
There is no "discrimation". To recognize someone has a mental imparity is not discimination.

If someone is retarded, they are fucking retarded, it is a "fact". It is also a "fact" that there are certain jobs "retards" cannot do.

fuck this thread dropped like a rock

/sci/ - what's the science behind photoshopping emma?

Emma thread? Emma thread.

My boss just a bit ago perfectly summarized the differences between engineers and scientists.

Scientists just stop whenever. Because their work is largely academic, and never practical, there is no clear goal to meet and whenever "enough" data is gathered, you can stop.

Engineering is qualitatively different. When an engineer creates a product that never existed, it is "trivial" because we have some "formula" for torque that the engineer "memorizes." The derision is clear. Fortunately engineers know better, and take the step that scientists fear: getting something done that actually works. Solving fifty small problems working against you. Building the instruments scientists only dimly envision to take the measurements they use to prove to themselves their worth.

But we engineers don't need such pomp and circumstance around us. We invent, we derive, we design and we build, and then we take our boatloads of cash and go home to sleep with our wives.

How's that grant proposal working out, /sci/entists?