/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15014282 Evolution.

Also who ever said quantum computer? Read the summary and/or the paper and refer to that not other things...the study found nothing less but also nothing more than that (for example no conclusions about how much of a role it plays or whether it only seems like that or truly is like that).

They write:
>we may have witnessed entanglement mediated by consciousness-related brain functions.
Here they go too far:
>Those brain functions must then operate non-classically, which would mean that consciousness is non-classical.
Because it's written in a misleading way that suggest that it would play a main role in conciousness, instead of only being involved in some way / to some extent.