/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3938980
Women defy logic! Drill into your head that their brains differ from you and I. They literally have different parts up there. The majority of their cortical tissues are dedicated to pointless pop-cultural phrases and the generation of copious amounts of sonic dissonance.
We men are privy to a larger brain; an arsenal of novel functions that are absent or highly diminished in females. Our spatial awareness; reasoning capacity; problem-solving aptitudes; motor skills and many, many more, dwarf our counterparts’ by a considerable margin. In fact, we are statistically less likely to go insane due to our dominion over our hypothalamus, the seat of emotions. That is correct boys, we command our psychology like a boss; we reek of excellence (and by the way, how fucking unprecedented, the human species expresses a statistical spike of neuroticism among women, incredible!).
Remember gentlemen, you are the product of billions of years of evolution, you are the driving force behind the species, YOU, not bullshit women. Women on the other hand are the result of a few million years of sexual selection; the bible was accurate to say females were derived from men. The sexier the cave-girl was, the more likely our forefathers would elect her as a vessel fit for reproduction. The point is attractive women were made for men, by men and for the pleasure of men.

>>3637387
That's so true. The only reason people go as far as to say that they are agnostic is because:
A. They reserve a part of their outlook on reality to faith.
or
B. They are polemicists quite content on splitting hairs for the purposes of distinguishing themselves.

Truth is when you pull out the dictionary and get technical about atheism or agnosticism you open up a real can of worms. The argument is that everyone is an agnostic of everything they haven't observed either directly or indirectly. Technically speaking you are an agnostic to weather or not the sun will come up tomorrow, you haven't seen the future. How can you KNOW it? Well you have a reasonable cause to believe it, so you don't actively think about out it. There is no reason to believe in God, or unicorns, there is also no reason to state you are an agnostic about these fictions either.

Stop being incredibly redundant by calling yourself agnostic as if your cryptic mannerisms are a vessel for your attempt to be an intellectually industrious pariah. We're on to you faggots.