/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10534920
Yeah. I use it to refer using M^3 to compute amplitudes. Computing amplitudes is important physics because that is what you compare to your experiment.

MbS has been in the news a lot lately. Let me proclaim it now and forever: M is not BS. M turns the crank from the nbhd of the origin, to the nbhs of plus infinity, to the nbhd of minus infinity, to the nbhd of the origin beyond infinity

HEY FRENS

>>10060717
>lots of crazies like you in internet history
I think my 47th degree masonic rank is unparalleled in history. The people who keep track of the high ranking guys know that only God has that rank. I don't know if you guys know those guys, but if you do then you can ask them and I bet they will tell you the truth.

>>9944949
>>9944929
And he Aspey is saying, "Kill him," maybe in reference to me, and my coworker at Exide Sandy had written on her whiteboard the whole time I worked there, "Send M3" with a bunch of numerical codes, likely meaning to kill me, and we never talked about M3 at work, and she never wrote anything on that white board while I was there.

>>9912503
The other smart people, for the most part, also want to see me scour the scum of my enemies from the face of the Earth. In fact, the billions of people who profess to worship the God of Abraham are eagerly awaiting the coming of the messiah/mashiach/madhi who will fulfill God's promise to slaughter the children of the wicked for the sins of their ancestors.

I'm not alone here: killing their children is righteous. God is good, and that is what he has promised to do... just like me.

>>9871518
Consider that the positive-definiteness of the p^0 component of the four momentum means that momentum was not conserved in the big bang, which was a zero net momentum state: there was no momentum before the universe existed. The p^i spatial components of the 4-momentum can sum to zero, meaning that a galaxy floating to the left has negative momentum with respect to a universe floating to the right, but the p0 component is positive everywhere in the universe (ADM 1960). Therefore, the big bang does not conserve momentum because time flows in one direction everywhere in the universe. Therefore, to remedy this problem, let the big bang originate two universes moving oppositely through time, with oppositely directed arrows of time such that p^0 is negative-definite in the second universe due to the negative time. After the big bang, one universe is behind the CMB with respect to the other and, therefore, is unlikely to disturb the other universe. One disturbance, however, is that the symmetry axis between the two universes can cause symmetric multipole moments in the CMB. These multipole alignments are anomalous in the model of the universe that doesn't conserve momentum, but if you add a second universe to conserve momentum, via exactly that logical deduction which led Pauli to theorize neutrinos, then we have a good reason to expect a symmetry axis in the CMB arising from the symmetry axis along which p^0 in one universe together with -p^0 in the other conserve the zero net 4-momentum that existed before the big bang.